Lately there has been talk about reforming or even getting
rid of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).
The contention is that municipalities know best how to plan
for their communities. So, who needs the
OMB?
That’s a crock.
When it gets down to decision making in municipalities local
politicians have the final say. They
aren’t planners. In fact, in a lot of
cases the extent of their planning experience is the scheduling of a day to
declare when they are running for re—election.
Take as Exhibit A the recent OMB hearing brought about when
the City of Hamilton blocked an attempt by a non-profit agency to consolidate
its programs under one roof.
I’ve written about this before. Last September’s piece talked a bit about the
ideas of distance separation by-laws. (http://whenthemayorsmiles.blogspot.ca/2012/09/local-governments-and-distance.html)
That is the tool that Hamilton used at
first to block Lynwood Charlton’s Centre’s (LCC) move.
Then the City changed their “planning” argument claiming
that the LCC program represented an “institutional” use. I wrote about it again http://whenthemayorsmiles.blogspot.ca/2012/10/more-nimby.html
At the end
of the day OMB member Makuch basically ruled the City had no good planning case. The Board was satisfied that the proposed
development was “consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2005 and
conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as well as the
City’s Official plan.” (You can find the
August 23rd decision at http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/english/eDecisions/eDecisions.html)
That position
had been forwarded to Hamilton Council some time ago. Most Councillors apparently believe that the
fact that they were popularly elected gives them license to override human
rights concerns.
Sure, the
OMB needs to be reformed. But cases like
this one demonstrate why we need a body like Ontario Municipal Board as a
safeguard to local idiocy.
No comments:
Post a Comment