Friday, December 23, 2022

Rupert Hotel Fire 33 years Later - Finally Some Progress on Reform

 

Friday December 23rd. 2022 marks the thirty-third anniversary of the Rupert Hotel fire and the loss of ten lives.

I attended a memorial service for the twentieth anniversary in 2009 at 182 Parliament Street.

Michael Shapcott speaks at 2009 event
Since that time, I’ve tried to reflect on this horrible event and the lack of progress in addressing the need for safe and affordable housing in Ontario.  


In the years following the tragedy, about 500 units of Toronto housing were created or upgraded to meet or exceed the already existing standards. Not long after a commemorative plaque was installed (read the plaque at https://www.readtheplaque.com/plaque/rupert-hotel-firenoting that the fire "sparked action by municipal and provincial governments and community organizations to improve conditions in rooming houses."  The funding that supported the upgrades and advocacy soon ended. 


There has not been much good to report since then.  Three years aback I wrote a poem where I was cynical about austerity policies that meant progress would ever be made in addressing the lessons learned from the fire.

Well I was wrong, so it seems.

Earlier this month the City of Toronto approved a regulatory framework that beginning March 2024 will allow tenants to rent in areas of Toronto where they are currently restricted.  There will be a citywide licensing system that should go a long way in making this form of housing safer.

Rooming houses, now known as multi-tenant houses, are the only option for many in the extremely unaffordable private market in Toronto and all over Ontario for that matter.

“I’ll be honest with you, I have tried 12 times – 12 times! – to get to this vote over the course of the last 14 years,” said Councillor. Gord Perks (Parkdale—High Park), told the Toronto Star. ``It is s a remarkable step forward, and I hope that we continue that momentum.”
https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2022/12/14/toronto-votes-to-legalize-rooming-houses-citywide-in-2024.html

Good news indeed.  I’m going to see who this all unfolds before I revise my poem.   Find it below.
--------------------------                                       



Rupert Hotel December 1989*

Gordon was sorry
but it was tough keeping warm
and he’d had some to drink 
so setting fire to those papers on the floor in the middle 
of his second-floor room made some kind of sense.
                
At the Rupert Hotel, a three-storey brick walk up
in a licensed city rooming house 
off Queen Street East 
at Parliament
those with few options and few dollars could exist, 
in a way. 
 
Gordon’s warming fire soon leapt out of control 
flames and choking smoke filling the corridors 
as the fire gained full possession of the hallways.
The license pinned to the wall wasn’t worth the paper 
it was printed on as far as the protection it afforded 
the 31 tenants at the Rupert
on this wintry December night. 

A sprinkler system might have halted the fire’s progress.
Perhaps tenants could have taken action 
if the alarm system had been operable 
or fire extinguishers stored in the basement were reachable.
It was 17 long minutes before someone called 911.
When firefighters arrived 
the whole building was enveloped. 
Flames leapt out of the top floor windows.
Firefighters using ladders forced their way 
into the searing heat of the second floor.  

Later a witness called it 
“A Vision out of Hell.”
As the fire raged people screamed, crying out for friends.
It took six hours and eighteen crews to subdue the blaze.
Thankfully, some tenants were saved and many escaped. 
For days crews chopped through ice and debris to locate bodies. 
They found nine men. 
A woman had returned to the building to help a friend 
Donna Marie Cann died, as had the others, 
of heavy smoke inhalation.

Soon an inquest was held.
Recommendations were made    
new rules created 
regulations established
housing planned.
After a while all was forgotten.
Rules and regulations lapsed, 
were ignored or opposed 
and the programs ended.

In the city today austerity policies 
compel people to rent rooms 
in perilous and dangerous buildings. 
Many flee the downtown to illegal suburban homes 
where life is cheaper. 


*According to the Fire Marshal, there were fires at 69 illegal rooming houses in the Toronto area between 2013 and 2017.


 

 


Thursday, December 15, 2022

Court Ruling on Homelessness Item in Regina Budget


A Regina City Councillor took his own municipality to court this week. 

On Tuesday December 13th Leblanc was before Justice John Morrall asking him to force the city administration to include $24.9 million for homelessness in the city budget.  A review of that budget began yesterday (December 14th).
 
LeBlanc was pushing for a mandamus order.  Such an order from a court obligates a government official to properly fulfill their official duties.

“Basically, three points are all agreed upon,” LeBlanc told reporters outside the courthouse afterwards as reported by sasktoday.ca. on Tuesday.

One is the city manager’s duties are outlined in the bylaws. I say that makes it public.

Second is we gave clear direction in June to put this money in the budget.

Third is she didn’t want to do that, so decided not to. I think that’s enough for mandamus, that’s the application we’re seeking.”
https://www.sasktoday.ca/provincial-news/arguments-heard-in-court-fight-against-city-manager-6240813

City manager Niki Anderson, was represented by Milad Alishahi. 

Alishahi’s argument was that the case for mandamus had not been made.  This isn’t a legal issue.  It is a political issue and other options were available to Council members than going to court. https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/city-hall/judge-wont-decide-on-application-to-include-homelessness-plan-in-city-budget-until-wednesday

Judge Morrall agreed with lawyer Alishahi. 
 
“I find that the court should be quite leery of being involved in the political machinations and debates between members of municipal, provincial or federal decision-making bodies,” wrote Morrall.
 
More details can be found at https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/city-hall/judge-dismisses-application-to-add-funding-for-ending-homelessness-to-city-budget
 
"This application is about the principle, not the politics," said LeBlanc. "If unelected officials can choose to not implement the decision of elected bodies then the system simply falls apart," LeBlanc told the CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/regina-ending-homelessness-court-1.6683016
 
From talking with Councillor LeBlanc, I anticipate that he will attempt to get money back into the budget to address the homelessness crisis but in a smaller amount.

Thursday, December 08, 2022

Councillors Take City to Court


Earlier this week Canadian Dimension published a story I wrote on city politics in Regina. It is not quite a man-bites-dog story but neither is it something that happens every day.   

Daniel LeBlanc, a Regina City Councillor is taking his own municipality to court.  Here is that story. https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/regina-has-a-plan-to-end-homelessness-so-whats-stopping-it
Councillor Daniel Leblanc

There have been some developments since that article was published.   On Tuesday most of the Regina Council signed on to a notice of motion that the Councillors who initiated the lawsuit have violated the Regina code of Ethics by-law.MN22.7 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/regina-city-council-mayor-manager-lawsuit-homelessness-1.6675651


To consider such a motion at yesterday’s (December 7th) Council meeting required unanimous support of Council.  That was received yesterday as the two Councillors who were involved in the suit did not vote because of what, I believe, would be a conflict of interest in Saskatchewan municipalities. https://regina.ctvnews.ca/regina-city-council-passes-motion-of-confidence-in-city-manager-niki-anderson-1.6185099 

In part the motion read: 

 “affirm and convey [council’s] continued confidence in City Manager Niki Anderson” and “express its disappointment over the negative impact on City Council’s operational integrity and oversight that the initiated court action has created.” 

Court proceedings are scheduled for next Tuesday ahead of Regina’s December 14th budget meeting.



Tuesday, October 18, 2022

A Thought on the Norfolk County 2022 Elections


There was a bit of a brouhaha November 17th 2020 down at the corner of Colborne and Calamity.  Maybe you will remember the occurrence.

Mayor Kristal Chopp called it a witch hunt, proceeded to axe and replace the Deputy Mayor and then left the building.

Of course, when Elvis left the building cheering crowds called for an encore but on the anniversary of the day when two rival municipalities Buda and Pest found a way to get along and merged a similar bonhomie was not to be found in Norfolk County. 

What about this witch hunting phenomenon?  It became the accusation du jour.

Witch hunting can be traced back to 18th century BC in ancient Egypt and Babylonia where punishment for nasty magic was addressed in the earliest law codes. Arthur Miller’s The Crucible  brought the term back and into the world of politics during the McCarthy era.   More recently, former President Trump consistently cast himself as a witch hunt victim on a par with the defendants in the Salem Witch Trials. 

Norfolk has its own tradition with the hunting of witches. Perhaps the witch trap used by Norfolk’s first settler, John Troyer, should be relocated from Norfolk Archives to Council Chambers to prevent any further transgressions.

However, lost in the excitement of that November afternoon’s shenanigans was the whole matter of the need for some clarity on what exactly the Norfolk Deputy Mayor does.

According to Norfolk Council’s procedural by-law as amended in 2017:

Deputy Mayor shall mean a Member of Council who is appointed, by By-Law or resolution of Council, to act from time to time in the place of the Mayor when the Mayor is absent from the municipality or absent through illness, or when the office is vacant and, while so acting, such Member has and may exercise all the rights, powers and authority of the Head of Council and this authority is delegated by Council under Section 23.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001 c.25

Not really helpful, is it?

Whatever the outcome on October 24th here is hoping the new Council will function with a much higher level of decorum and respect for its members and citizens.

And maybe they will update that procedural by-law as it relates to deputy mayor duties. 



Tuesday, October 11, 2022

Writing a Letter


Yesterday I sat down to write a letter to my Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP).

I’ve written similar letters in the past and received no response.  Perhaps I need a new approach. 
Maybe my letters haven’t been clear enough. Do my sentences run on? Does my correspondence suffer from subject verb disagreement?  Surely it must be one of these errors as I ‘m quite certain there would be no disagreement with my theme – fairness.  We all support fairness, don’t we? 

Specifically, my fruitless letters have attempted to address the lack of fairness of the social assistance system in Ontario.

There is much to be said about social assistance.  Space limits me.    First let’s talk about rates. In Ontario there are two basic programs.

The Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) is one. This program is designed to help people with disabilities who are in financial need pay for living expenses, like food and housing. 

Ontario Works (OW) is the other program.  OW helps people in financial need pay for living expenses, like food and housing.  Both programs can also give support in finding a job.
 
You have to qualify.  It isn’t easy.  But more about that later.

There was a time when social assistance rates bore some relationship to the real cost of living.  Not often did that occur but 1993 was a year where it could be argued that some fairness had been achieved.

Then along came Mike Harris.  During the 1995 election campaign, the poverty denying golf pro teed off on single mothers who were receiving assistance depicting them as some sort of boogie monsters ripping off the oppressed taxpayers of Ontario.  

Harris’s fabricated characterization was successful - politically at least. In 1995 he reduced social assistance rates in Ontario by 22%. It was one of the first acts of his new government.
Former Premier Mike Harris
made Big Cuts to Social
Assistance



Let’s be clear. There was no economic rationale for this move – just a mean spirited, ill informed attempt to make social assistance rates unattractive and presumably to make people find jobs that didn’t exist or that they weren’t qualified to do.

Today those rates are far below poverty levels.  How far?  A single parent with two children receives $1989 per month on ODSP.  The shelter allowance for a single person receiving OW is $390 per month.  Try finding a place to live for $390.  

Earlier this year, John Stapleton, a respected public policy guru, took a look at rates. He went back to those fairer 1993 rates and built in the 16.2% inflation that had occurred up to January 2022 and came up with new rates.    OW and ODSP would have to be raised 67% to get back to those levels.

What needs to happen?

A few years ago advocates drafted legislation that proposed a simple idea. An expert panel would be set up.  Each year the panel would recommend appropriate evidence-based social assistance rates to the Provincial Government. There were details but that was the idea in a nutshell.

An Act to Establish the Ontario Social Assistance Rates Board was introduced for first reading as a private member’s bill in the Ontario Legislature in June 2007. Unfortunately, the Legislature was prorogued the next day in anticipation of a fall election, meaning the Bill was effectively discontinued. Similar efforts have been launched since with the same result.
MPP Ted McMeekin proposed
a rates board in 2007


Another less talked about change took place nearly twenty-five years ago when the Family Benefits program was changed to ODSP. 

First, access to social assistance was made much more difficult as people were forced to reduce their assets before qualifying.  Many “stupid rules” were introduced - over 800 according to a 2004 report from the Ministry of Community and Social Services who ironically administered the stupid rules.  Front line workers spent at least 80% of their time on administrative issues, like filling out forms etc…, and not addressing the needs of recipients. 

With these changes qualifying for the program became a big issue. A majority of people applying for ODSP were turned down.  People had the right to appeal internally and then if unsuccessful they could go to a body called the Social Benefits Tribunal, an administrative body that deals specifically with appeals regarding social assistance, for a final appeal. 

A lot of hoops to jump through but if you did the hoop jumping you were usually successful in your appeal.  In fact, if you had legal help your chances of winning were over 90%.  That legal help (usually in the form of a community legal clinic caseworker) was then seen as a problem so the legal clinics’ funding was cut.   

I’m going to take another shot at writing that letter.  There is more that could be said about fairness but I’m fairly certain that any fool can see that the system is unfair.  Why waste time with that argument.       

I need to focus on eliminating those run on sentences and getting the verbs to agree with the subjects.


Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Police Budgets

Here is a timely opinion piece by Mohamad Bsat.  It is called Why is Hamilton's Police Budget so taboo? and can be found ahttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/election-column-police-budget-1.6587782?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar  

The piece brought back memories from many years ago when I tried to reduce the police budget.I recollected that event in the poem that follows.

                                    ---------------------------------

                The Budget*

On a long ago budget day, a procedural quirk
put a simple regional ward councillor
in a position to freeze the police budget.
Ward councillors don’t obstruct police budgets
because, as we all learned as kids,
the police(man) is our friend
does important and dangerous work
protects and keep us safe and
for all of this deserves to be well paid.


These are things that ward councillors,
even simple ones, should understand.
But since the common sense drumbeat
set the revolution in motion
we have come to know that the best government is
to have practically no government at all
and respect for hard-earned taxpayer’s dollars
is the order of the day.

Others are compelled to run their ship tightly
while the law and order liner sails unimpeded
through the calm waters of political indifference.
On that budget day, the simple ward councillor
Having, for a time, ascended
to the lofty heights of budget committee member
advanced what was (by his own humble admission)
a particularly persuasive presentation
convincing the one colleague who needed convincing
that police spending should be apprehended and
it was a great day for local democracy
or at least it seemed that way.
But the votes aren’t counted
until the politicians raise their hands
and when they did
the police got their money, as they always do.

No media or public witnessed the sad event though
police brass made time in otherwise busy days
to behold the councillor’s misbegotten manoeuvre.
Following his 15 minutes of small town fame
our councillor drove his car like an undertaker.
Even now, my lane changes are by-the-book perfect
and inviolable police budgets escalate still.
                                       ---------------------------------

*Originally published in The Dream The Glory and The StrifeRaymond Fenech (Editor), Barnes and Noble 2016


Sunday, September 04, 2022

Looking for Respect


After the recent disturbing verbal assault on Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, I flashed back to 1965.  Remember that hit song Eve of Destruction song by Barry McGuire?  

Songwriter P.F. Sloan bemoaned the disintegration of human respect; found “the whole crazy world  ...just too frustratin'” Grim as it was in 1965, I doubt Sloan or McGuire could have imagined the extent of disintegration we are facing in 2022. 

Based on what I and others observe that is offered up on social media these days this attack on Freeland is not unique. Women. racialized individuals and groups, LGBQT people, non- Christians are all targets.  The list could go on.  
Deputy PM Freeland


In fact, it is pretty much open season for attacks against anyone whose opinion differs from that often anonymous person tethered to the keyboard whose only qualification to shout and fume is their ability to remember a password  

Politicians at all levels are under siege and things are heading downhill fast.

In my time as a municipal councillor (1991-97) it wasn’t like this.  In 1998, after serving for six years I presented a paper at a health promotion conference on local government and how it could work most effectively with community. 

The mainly European audience at a Scottish university challenged my thesis that local government was up to the task.

My theme was based on a fairly positive perception of local government and my optimistic, clearly biased view of elected officials

I put it all down to the fact that we just did a better job of local governance in North America.  The old world didn’t get it.

Then I moved on to other things.

After a nine year break I was back in local politics when my former wardmate moved on down the road to the House of Commons. Nine years away and boy how things had changed.

That change was brought about as people gained access to electronic mail, the internet and social media.

Back in the old days if a constituent had an issue to discuss it could often get resolved through something called dialogue. You remember that concept perhaps.

The councillor would make a phone call or meet in person with the constituent.  There were often nuances or complexities that one or the other had failed to take into account   Issues got resolved.  There was no shouting.

By the 21st century constituents simply had to go to their computer and punch in the requisite putdown, question your integrity and/or intelligence and copy the whole diatribe to everyone on their contact list. 

I should have seen this coming.  Back around 1998 I met futurist Robert Theobald.  Theobald argued that a “failure to listen” by decision makers had meant “that groups with certain attitudes and beliefs may come to feel they have been left out of the democratic process.”  In Reworking Success (1997) Theobald proposed that we move beyond “polar positions” and learn to define problems in wholly different terms.

Something to think about.

In the meantime let’s: 

**Stop the name calling in our public spheres. 

**Teach civics in our schools.  (Ontario is introducing a compulsory half credit program in September 2022 – a positive development)

**Find ways to ensure that news coverage focusses on facts.  I’m pretty sure the earth is round although I haven’t actually seen it in its roundness. We don’t give equal time to the flat earth society.  Why do we give it to crazy conspiracy theorists?

**Establish new rules for social media.  It won’t be simple but a balance needs to be found between the right for us to speak our minds and what is appropriate,  constructive and healthy.   



Monday, June 06, 2022

D-Day


*Nearly 150,000 Allied troops landed or parachuted into the invasion area on D-Day, including 14,000 Canadians at Juno Beach. My father was one of the men who landed that day.

(This piece adapted from the Sherbrooke Fusilier War Diaries originally appeared in The Dream The Glory and the Strife edited by Raymond Fenech - 2018 Hidden Brook Press.) 


Found in the Sherbrooke Fusilier War Diaries 
                
June 4-6 1944                                              
                                                                                     
High winds and low clouds stall D-Day 24 hours.          
In spite of the wind the flotilla sails southward                        
all night via charted channel waters. Men ruminate     
over what awaits on shore then land is sighted             
at 1000 hrs off Berniere-Sur-Mere. Craft start                        
the run in to the beach, men quite calm                        
sitting on top of their vehicles watch the shore.   
The Regiment lands, moves forward, no casualties                  
but next day German tanks make a first appearance,  
force the CDN infantry to retire with 63 killed,              
wounded or missing. Later, ready to move on                
a half hour notice, the sun sets amidst black                          
banks of clouds leaving a dirty red smudgy sky             
with the boom of distant gunfire broken                        
by the sharper rattle of nearby machine guns.
Everything seems ominous. Everyone is on alert.          
                                                                                   
July 18, 1944                                         

The shadow of death passes over Headquarters. 
In minutes, 21 cm mortars take thirty-one lives. 
Heavier casualties than a normal day’s fighting.            
                                                                                                              
August 25, 1944                                           
                                                                                     
An extensive map issue arrives showing vast
distances and fabulous advances imagined by HQ.
Startling indeed, as those left from D-Day recall
the slow, difficult struggle for CAEN and the
devastating exploitation and FALAISE assault.
Two days later considerable friction develops                 
among all command levels. Little is accomplished         
due to the lack of appreciation by the Infantry              
of issues arising using armour in country where
dense woods greatly limit the traversing of guns.
                                                                                     
September 1944 – May 1945                                                                                                                                                                     
A few men who were through the thickest fighting                  
are a little jittery yet but doing well and should            
soon be over it as the Regiment fights on in NWE. 


The Royal Canadian Navy contributed 110 ships and 10,000 sailors and the RCAF contributed 15 fighter and fighter-bomber squadrons to the assault. Total Allied casualties on D-Day reached more than 10,000, including 1,074 Canadians, of whom 359 were killed. By the end of the Battle of Normandy, the Allies had suffered 209,000 casualties, including more than 18,700 Canadians. Over 5,000 Canadian soldiers died. (From the Canadian Encyclopedia.)

Monday, May 30, 2022

We Must Act Without Delay


I am a senior concerned about future generations; i.e., I want them to have a future on a livable planet.

A UN climate report predicts quicker global warming than anticipated.  It is a “code red” for humanity, according to the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

The Intergovernmental panel on climate change conclusions were clear. We must stop fossil fuel expansion, rapidly phase out the production and burning of fossil fuels, and invest heavily in renewable energy.

Meanwhile in Ontario Doug Ford has:
  • Spent over $230 million to tear up green energy contracts.
  • Ripped out Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations that had been installed at GO Stations.
  • Cut the big energy users electricity bills while shifting those costs to citizens.
  • Cancelled rebates on EVs.
  • Gutted conservation authorities’ ability to protect communities against flooding and erosion.

  • Weakened the Endangered Species Act to promote development.
  • Escalated the use of Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZO’s) to push through development on sensitive ecological lands and 
  • Scrapped the provincial tree-planting program.
 
These are but a few examples of Ford’s lack of understanding of the climate emergency we are facing.  Incredibly, this week he claimed that building more highways was a solution to the crisis.
 
We need to protect wetlands, waterways, forests and other natural ecosystems. We must create adaptation plans that range from climate risk reduction to strengthened income and food security provisions.
 
We must act without delay.

 


Wednesday, May 04, 2022

Deserving

(I'm hoping that the 2022 Ontario election campaign looks at the issue of poverty.  Here is a story I wrote on poverty in Ontario.  I made it up but it could be true. This story won the 2021 Norfolk County’s Laureate award for fiction.  It will take you about 18 minutes to read.  

-----------

“You need to tell them where the bodies are buried.”

Councillor Ken Williams could not get that strange phone message out of his head.

There had been that anonymous call left on his voice mail this morning – the fourth consecutive day this had occurred.  Of course, it wasn’t that unusual to get odd calls. 

Somehow, though, this one was different.

What bodies?  Buried where, he wondered.

Williams, Ward 2 Councillor for the City of Clarovista, was headed into a municipal council meeting on this gloomy Tuesday.  It promised to be a long day.  

As he made his way to his seat, Williams was approached by Sharon Smith, the diligent city reporter for the Clarovista Clarion.

“Councillor Williams, could I speak with you about some strange calls we have been getting at the Clarion?”

“I’m not sure I could help you about calls you are receiving Sharon,” Williams answered warily.  

“They have been mentioning your name,” she continued.

“My name? Umm, sure.  Perhaps we could talk after the meeting.”

“Alright then, I’ll catch you after. Doesn’t look like there will be much exciting news to write about from this meeting.”

Just then Mayor Ted Martin, decked out in a designer Grey Notch Lapel Suit complete with chain of office trailed by his executive assistant, glided past Smith and Williams. Late by about ten minutes as is/was his custom.  Now the meeting could commence.

This was Williams’ sixth year on Council.  He’d long ago figured out the routine.  As sure as the rainbow smelt will run into Lake Vista in the spring, staff bring this particular report every April.  It is called The Annual Review of Grants for Agencies and Organizations that Operate Health and/or Social Services Programs. 

The verbose report title mirrored an awkward process that compelled organizations to jump through a nonsensical number of unnecessary hoops. That review would likely take up the bulk of today’s meeting.

The regular April crowd was all there; agency people, community activists, those with lived experience.  Some of Williams’ colleagues referred to these people as members of “special interest groups.” But Williams had learned long ago from his trade unionist grandfather who the real special interest groups were.  

“Kenny,” he’d say, “never underestimate the power of the banks and their shady sidekicks – the developers.”  

This year Council had an additional delegation, an expert on social policy from the university.  Williams knew Dr. Patricia Fleming slightly and had gone to a couple of seminars in which she had participated.

Fleming was called to the lectern by the Mayor and began her presentation with the usual salutary remarks. Then she moved on to territory that was familiar to Williams.
“Ontario’s treatment of the poor goes back to the 18th century and is built on the whole idea that there are two types of poor people - deserving poor and the non-deserving poor,” she lectured. 

Williams knew this; had made the point himself as it related to the current situation in the 
province.
“The first piece of legislation important for you to understand,” Fleming continued, “is the Constitution Act of 1791.”

Oh dear, thought Williams, she will never get through 204 years of Ontario social policy history within her ten-minute time allocation.

“In setting up the governance structure for Upper Canada, or Ontario as we now know it, Lieutenant Governor Simcoe took most elements from Great Britain’s legislation except, and this is paramount, not the poor law.  Other jurisdictions, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, to name two, adopted the Poor Laws.  You must appreciate that this effort to ban a poor law in Ontario promoted the growth of private charities.  All these charities held their own distinct beliefs and this resulted in weakening of public support for those in need.”

Mayor Martin cleared his throat.  

“Mrs. Fleming I’m concerned that you are veering off topic.  I’m having trouble seeing 
what any of what you are saying has to do with what is on the agenda today.”

“It’s Doctor Fleming, sir.  On the contrary Mr. Mayor this history has everything to do with today’s agenda.  May I continue without interruption, please?”

“Before you do, could you tell us a little more about Poor Laws, Dr. Fleming,” piped up Councillor Jim Bristow.

“No, No, Councillor there will be time for questions later. I need to keep Mrs. Fleming, Dr Fleming, on track.” The Mayor liked to be in control.   

Dr. Fleming carried on.

“As I was saying in Ontario, specific forms of outdoor relief (coal, bread, milk) and institutional relief were offered to those who were considered deserving. We are talking here about the aged and infirm, widows, “deserted” mothers, apprenticed children.  In addition, sometimes public work jobs were provided to new arrivals and those considered able-bodied."  

Just as the Mayor was about to interrupt again there was grumbling and shuffling in the public seats.  As Martin reached for his gavel, two determined women rushed the dais.  One grabbed the chief magistrate by his shoulders while the other attempted to yank the chain of office from his neck.  This removal was not without difficulty especially as the mayor’s dutiful assistant had leapt into the fray to save the Mayor from harm.  

Harming the Mayor was not part of the plan though; it was the chain of office the women were after. After a short tussle, the assailants had the chain in hand and were dashing out of the committee room shouting something about justice, a cover up and buried bodies.  Williams recognized these women from earlier protest actions around town.  They were part of a group called Clarovista Coalition for Fairness and Justice (CCFJ).
.
Meanwhile the Mayor lay sprawled inelegantly on the floor.

“We will have a fifteen-minute adjournment,” mewled his worship as he struggled to regain his feet - unhurt but dispossessed of the 130-year-old symbol of mayoral primacy.
Members of the public and those Clarovista bureaucrats assembled for the meeting sat in stunned silence.

“Wow. Now I’ve got a story idea,” Sharon Smith declared. 

As what had happened was unprecedented no one really knew what to do.  The exhaustive Clarovista emergency preparedness booklet that detailed procedures did not cover theft of the chain of office. Consequently no one thought to pursue the thieves.

The Mayor staggered from the room as his executive assistant announced that it had now been decided that the meeting was adjourned at the call of the Chair.  

Dr. Fleming had returned to the dais and was trying to be heard while waving a book over her head.  Her efforts were pointless as no one could hear above the commotion.  

Sharon Smith, the reporter, had found a quiet place to send in her story. 

For his part, Williams meandered to the front of the room to persuade Dr. Fleming that it might be best to send in the remainder of her presentation to the clerk’s department.  They would distribute it to Council members.  She seemed deflated but handed Williams a book entitled Poverty in Ontario 1791-2000.

“I’d like you to have this book Councillor Williams.  I think you will find the chapter that covers the history of the Clarovista Poorhouse of particular interest."

Days went by and yet there was no news of the missing chain of office.

After all that had occurred at the Tuesday Council the meeting that reconvened the following Monday was somewhat of an anti-climax.  

Not to the various agencies who had appealed their grants, of course.  Some of their appeals were successful, others not.  Councillors seized the opportunity to interject their presumed sage advice to the various agencies - Do more with less, build partnerships, consider more fundraising projects.  Always at play was the whole matter of who ought to get service and who was not really entitled to it.  After all the hard-working families of Clarovista could not be expected to dig into their pocketbooks to support every nutty idea the kumbaya crowd chose to advance.

Those same issues were dealt with at length in Poverty in Ontario 1791-1995. Dr. Fleming had written a surprisingly interesting book.  Chapter Sixteen, which dealt with the history of the Clarovista poorhouse, filled in some blanks for Williams who had put aside other reading on the weekend to go through Fleming’s book.

Of course, Williams knew that poorhouses were established in the mid 19th century
to house people who required food, shelter, or care in order to survive.

The poorhouse was a response to the number of people begging on the streets, wandering the countryside, or languishing in jails.

The Clarovista poorhouse existed from 1877 up until 1933 when the municipality decided to sell off assets to raise money during the depression.  The property had been in what is currently Williams’ ward somewhere up in the northeast corner near where Mayor Martin lives.  Williams studied the map that was included in Fleming’s book.  Hold on.

“This is the mayor’s property.  That’s odd,” Williams said aloud.    

Chapter 16 laid out a map of the Poorhouse and its 50-acre site complete with building sketches showing the large stone house built in the Italianate style, barn and various out buildings, the hospital wing and the pest house.  The living arrangements were dormitory style – one side of the house women and children; the other for men.    

There were also drawings of the confinement cells or idiot cells as they were called that were used for discipline purposes. Sadly, two brothers, Harold (Inmate #1238) and Joseph Cook Inmate #1239), incarcerated behind the iron cell doors of the confinement cells perished in a fire in 1933.   The brothers had been locked in the cells for repeatedly violating the curfew and for their inability and unwillingness to find work. 

It was said that they missed curfew as they were travelling to distant towns looking for work that was hard to come by during the depression.  But at the poorhouse rules were rules and the Cook brothers had run afoul of those rules.  
 
Some in the community had called for an inquest but the authorities decided against one as fire deaths were fairly common at the time and there were complications as there was some confusion as to the location of the remains of the deceased brothers. 

The main building had been destroyed contributing to the decision to sell the property. Inmates were relocated to nearby Carson Creek.  

The Keeper, Janek Marcin, left town but turned up several years later living on the same property.  
 
How did one become an inmate at the Clarovista Poorhouse, Williams wondered.

Dr. Fleming had provided her business card with her book.  Her home number was on the back of the card. Williams dialed the number.

“Dr. Fleming, Ken Williams here.  I’m enjoying your book.  Could I ask you a couple of questions?”

“Certainly Councillor, I have some time, go ahead.”

“Well, I’m not totally clear on how people became inmates – inmate that is a horrible word - of the poorhouse.”

“It was fairly simple. Your predecessors were quite involved.”

“The Council was involved?”

“Yes.  People who had been living in Clarovista for at least two years who needed help could apply to the mayor.  The mayor and council would determine whether the Poorhouse was the best fit for the individual or family.   Then they would have to approve a recommendation for the person or people to be sent to the Poorhouse.  It was a public process like authorizing spending for a bridge or approving monies to send a councillor to a conference.”

“This just seems wrong, Dr. Fleming.”

“Yes, of course it is wrong but is it really any different than what Council does these days?  

Last week’s meeting is a case in point.  Agencies having to grovel and answer ridiculous questions from uniformed members of council Not you Councillor, of course.) in order to maintain their organizations funding or get small incremental increases to continue important community work.” 

“The budget is really tight this year, Patricia.”

“But the budget isn’t the issue, Ken.  There is a bigger community picture at play.
They chatted some more. After Dr Fleming hung up Williams was left with an uneasy feeling as he returned to his reading.

In that year of the fire, 1933, thirty percent of the labour force was out of work, and one-fifth of the population was dependent on government assistance. Ironically, the Cook brothers’ grandfather, Jonah Cook, had donated part of his farm to the County as the site for the Poorhouse.

The phone rang interrupting Williams.  It was Sharon Smith from the Clarion.  Williams considered not picking up but did just before the call went to voice mail.

Ms. Smith, how are you today?”

“Fine, Councillor.  I’m looking for a comment.”

“On……?”

“The Chain of Office has been located on the Mayor’s property in a small wooded area.”

“Really!”

“Yes, what do you think of that, Councillor Williams?”

“Well, what I think is that you should ask the mayor about it.”

“I have.  He wasn’t helpful.”

“Wasn’t helpful?”

“He said it was none of my business what was on his property. Stay off his property. He was almost shouting. The Chain of Office has been recovered and that was that.”

“Well, there is some truth to what the mayor said, don’t you think?”

“Sure, some truth.  But the Chain was in a strange spot.”

“Well, of course, it was in the woods on the mayor’s rather nice property.  It is supposed to be at city hall.” 

“No.  That’s not what I mean.  It was around the neck of a scarecrow that was dressed in a grey suit, with a City of Clarovista lapel pin and an official tie.  The scarecrow was dressed to, you know, look like the mayor.  And it had a note pinned to it.”

“A scarecrow with a note pinned to it?”

“Yes.  Here is what it said.  

Knock, knock
Who’s over there?
Harold and Joseph
And no one cares.
  
And this mayor scarecrow thingy is pointing off further into the woods.  Do you understand any of it? What is the story here?”

Williams took a deep breath thinking of how to answer.

“Those calls we’ve been getting are beginning to make sense. Maybe history has something to tell us when we know where the bodies are buried.  That’s what you should write about.”