Friday, January 21, 2022

When History Stopped


On the 72 anniversary of George Orwell's death it seems appropriate to share some of his thoughts on truth, history and writing.
-----

I started out with good intentions to offer a few thoughts on Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell Tolls.

In typical ass backwards fashion I had seen the movie Hemingway and Gellhorn (2012) earlier this summer.  That prompted me to read the first-rate Hotel Florida by Amanda Vaill.

I didn’t particularly like this man Hemingway portrayed in the book and the film.  I also realized I didn’t know much about the Spanish Civil War so decided to read For Whom the Bell Tolls.

I’ve read Old Man and the Sea.  Years ago A Moveable Feast was required in some course or other way back when.

And now a song, Hemingway, by the late writer/singer Paul Quarrington resonates in my head.


                        “I like my fiction with a chaser of beer
                        Real short worlds and a vision that is clear
                        Hemingway is the one I read
                        Real straight shooter gives me what I need
                        Hemingway always gets it right
                        With a simple syntax and a prose that’s tight.

But short worlds and clear vision are not what I found.

You’re probably familiar with the story.  Considered one of the century’s great works of fiction, For Whom the Bell Tolls tells the tale of Robert Jordan, employed in America as a college instructor of Spanish who now fights as a demolition expert with the Loyalists.  Jordan’s assignment is to blow up a bridge.  He leads several Spanish guerillas in the undertaking.

The narrative unfolds slowly and largely leaves aside big picture issues of fascism, democracy, freedom and communism.  Robert Jordan is a committed man who nevertheless questions to what exactly he is committed.  For example, Jordan recognizes those he must kill as living individuals just like himself.  In the end Jordan accepts the importance of man as an individual and as an integral part of humankind.

For Whom the Bell Tolls was a tremendous commercial success.  Nearly half a million copies (491,000) were sold in six months following its October 1940 publication. 

Hemingway was known to stretch the truth but in For Whom the Bell Tolls, it has been said that this aspiration of the writing of “a true book which in its invention is truer than any other thing that ever happened” may have been realized.

By and large most critics agreed.  Not all though.

Spanish author Arturo Barea wrote that Hemingway was a spectator who wanted to be an actor.

“Yet it is not enough to look on; to write truthfully you must live, and you must feel what you are living,” avowed Barea from the perspective of a Spaniard who had no choice but to live with the realities of war.

Hemingway gained his understanding of the Spanish War while filing stories for the North American newspaper Alliance.  For this he was well paid - $1,000 per story.  At the same time he was occupied with making a film on the war – the Spanish Earth. 

On filming days, he and his entourage would rush out from their base at Madrid’s marble facaded Hotel Florida to find a good elevated spot to view the fighting.

“I had on figured out from studying the terrain, with this probability in mind, some days before.  When we reached it, sweating heavily and beginning to be most thirsty again, the view was marvelous.  The battle was spread out before us.” 

It is argued that much of what Hemingway wrote on Spain during this period was propaganda.  Certainly his film was.

Madrid during the War

So what about truth?

George Orwell had something to say on the matter.

The English writer argued that history had, in fact, stopped in Spain in 1936.  Orwell put this idea forward in Looking Back on the Spanish Civil War, four years after General Francisco Franco seized power from the democratically elected government of the Second Spanish Republic.

On July 18th of that year, elements of the Spanish Army led by Franco and far right supporters including the Catholic Church attempted to overthrow the government.  They failed on that day.  But it was only the beginning.  Fascist Germany and Italy joined in to support Franco and by 1939 the dictator was ensconced in power. 


Orwell, already skeptical of media, had seen that reporting in Spain’s newspapers “did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie.” 

Orwell, then a virtually unheard of English writer known as Eric Blair, worried that the “concept of objective truth (was) fading out of the world and lies would pass into history.”

There was “news” of great battles “where there had been no fighting and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed.”  Back in London at the time newspapers were selling such lies “and eager intellectuals (were) building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened.” 

If the established media was not telling the truth could truth be found in the stories of independent journalists and writers?

Like Hemingway’s fictional character Robert Jordan, Eric Blair was on the front lines.

Blair had gone to Spain in 1936 to report on the conflict but actually ended up fighting on the side of the Loyalists.  Initially he was uninterested in the political situation but when at the front he found himself:

“in the middle of a political discussion that practically never ended.  In the draughty evil-smelling barn of the farm-house where we were billeted, in the stuffy blackness of dug-outs. Behind the parapet in the freezing midnight hours, the conflicting ‘party lines’ were debated over and over.”

Blair had some sympathy for the enemy as “(m)any of the troops opposite…were not Fascists at all, merely wretched conscripts who had been doing their military service at the time when war broke out and were only too anxious to escape.”

“How will the history of the Spanish war be written.” 

Orwell answered his own question in his later works Animal Farm and 1984.  In 1984 protagonist Winston Smith, an editor in the Records Department at the Ministry of Truth, makes a surprising discovery.

“Who controls the past controls the future:

Who controls the present controls the past.”

In the case of Spain that “who” was the Franco government which remained in power until 1975.  However, the various factions aligned against Franco, particularly Stalin’s Soviet Union, promoted their own version of the truth.

Restarting History

Like the passenger pigeon it seems that truth has vanished forever from our political discourse.

Not that long ago when Trump was President of the United States and still tweeting he posted a tweet where, in one sentence, he made 4 false claims.  A tweet is about  two short sentences.

This came as no surprise to those paying attention to the state of today’s politics.

In Ontario the Premier, of his self-styled Government for The people makes promises like:

                        No one will lose their job, absolutely no one.
                        I’ll lower hydro rates by 12 per cent.
                        We won’t touch the Greenbelt. of Ontario 

It is not enough that the promises are unfulfilled but that such statements are repeated so often that they become assumed authentic.

So, if history stopped in 1936, can it be restarted?

In various jurisdictions around the world people have embarked on memory projects.  Spain is one example.  Here, where the history of their Civil War has been suppressed years after Franco was gone, graduate students have been recording audiovisual testimonies of militants, witnesses, and victims of the Spanish Civil War and Francoist repression.

Perhaps history can be launched again.

Wednesday, January 05, 2022

Social Assistance Rates and the Ontario Election

Social assistance rates should have some relation to the real cost of living but almost never have. 

(See http://whenthemayorsmiles.blogspot.com/2020_10_19_archive.html)

Rates in 1993 under the Bob Rae NDP government were set at a level that arguably reflected the real cost of living. They don’t now.

With a provincial election coming up in June it is interesting to speculate on what the major parties will offer on the policy front re social assistance rates. (Note: We are talking about what is politically possible not what is right.) 

John Stapleton, a respected public policy guru, looks at the issue in https://openpolicyontario.com/16-2-in-22-a-social-assistance-litmus-for-2022/

There has been one small increase of 1.5% to Ontario Works (OW) since the Ford government was elected in 2018.  Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) had a single 1.5% increase as well that was, in fact, a rollback of a promised 3% boost.

Stapleton takes those 1993 fairer rates and calculates that OW and ODSP would have to be raised 67% to get back to those levels. Politically that is a non-starter.

In the 1995 election poverty denier Mike Harris succeeded in portraying single mothers receiving assistance as some sort of boogie monsters ripping off the oppressed taxpayers of Ontario

One of Harris’ first acts as premier was to cut social assistance rates by 21.6%.  

Stapleton takes 1995 as a starting point, builds in the 16.2% inflation that has occurred since then and comes up with new rates.   

“… the OW single rate would climb by 16.2% from $733 a month to $852 a month… a  similar 16.2% increase to ODSP (would) take the single rate from $1,169 to $1,359 a month.”

It is doable.  The Ford government is spending less on this file.  Since the beginning of the pandemic in April 2020, the number of social assistance beneficiaries has fallen by 15% or over 146,000 beneficiaries. 

I’ve written to MPP (see below) and hope you will too.  We should expect a commitment from all provincial parties to do something about the injustice of inadequate social assistance rates.   


This story has been updated to reflect the fact that OW rates were increased by 1.5% in 2018.
---------------
December 22, 2021
Toby Barrett 
MPP Haldimand Norfolk 
 

 Dear Mr. Barrett, 

Re: Raising Social Assistance Rates for Individuals 

Nearly a year ago (January 26, 2021) I wrote to you about the need to raise social assistance rates.

Other than acknowledgement that my letter was received, I have not received a reply from you.

For social assistance recipients the situation has worsened over the past year. 

Rates are the same and continue to be well below poverty levels.  Canada’s Consumer Price Index has risen 4.4% the highest rate since 2003.

Meanwhile your government has made no meaningful investments or taken any action on programs or policies that would improve income security for low-income Ontarians. 

In terms or digital access, the government seems to believe that building infrastructure is all that is needed.  While you have pledged $2 billion in broadband infrastructure, no money has been provided to assist low-income Ontarians pay for Canada’s high internet and data costs. Now, Tribunals in Ontario are moving to a digital-first approach.  Investing in subsidizing internet costs for people on social assistance and all low income Ontarians is essential for both access to caseworkers and access to justice. 

It is imperative that social assistance rates be raised to reflect the real cost of living in Ontario.

Your attention to this matter is appreciated.  I look forward to your response.   

Sincerely, 
Bob Wood