Ridership on Burlington Transit is up, particularly recently.
This won’t stop some members of Council from taking a knife to it.
“I won’t be swayed by a couple of good months,” Councillor John Taylor made clear at Community and Corporate Service Committee this past Wednesday.
Taylor thinks we may have to “look at a simplified system.”
Simplified? One can only imagine.
My mind flashed back some 15 years to an idea put forward by another councillor. That brainwave – and I’m not making this one up - was to take the buses back to the garage when they were empty. It would save money.
Presumably, potential riders waiting along abandoned routes could hail taxis or maybe just take the day off work.
I’m confident that the current cost containment exercise will come up with better ideas. But I worry.
Empty Buses?
Councillors and senior staff agonize over empty buses.
It is a fact that hard worker taxpayers, mostly men as I recall,
find time to phone city hall and complain about those empty buses observed, I am sure, while cruising around town as the sole occupant in their carbon spewing SUVs. No irony there, eh?
But the buses aren’t empty. Performance statistics show nearly 9,000 boardings every weekday.
Councillor Rick Goldring noted the number of people riding the buses is about the same as the number who frequent our libraries. No one is questioning the need for libraries. Transit ought to be the same.
Stay Tuned
The data we put forward at committee suggested Burlington is not putting the emphasis on transit that other communities have.
Councillors, not unreasonably, questioned this data and asked staff to look at the numbers.
Much of the discussion focused on the fact that our neighbouring town, Oakville, seemed to spend more dollars on transit and had better performance too.
There are challenges as Councillor Craven acknowledged but the future will see us “more dependent on transit.”
“We have to invest in our infrastructure.”
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Friday, March 28, 2008
Old Blogger, Old Bus and the Same Old Story - Part One
Off to City Hall this week to speak to the issue of public transit.
The City of Burlington has initiated a cost containment exercise. And while, like motherhood and apple pie, we all want costs contained, we also want to maintain a decent transit system.
Some would argue we don’t have a decent system in this community now. Some transit users get frustrated, give up on the buses and buy cars. I heard of four who had just this week.
Sadly, many in the community don’t support public transit. Sometimes these people get elected. But I digress.
The presentation Doug Brown and I prepared is available should you be interested. (e-mail me at timberline24@hotmail.com)
The essence of the presentation was that it is important for our environment and important to the quality of life in our town that we have good transit.
We’d like the cost containment exercise to keep that in mind.
New Street # 10 Bus
A surprising amount of the discussion at Committee focused on the 23 year old bus I rode to City Hall.
Does this seem old to you? Twenty years ago all municipal buses were pulled from service after 18 years. That has changed ("financial constraints") - and Burlington has been buying and repairing old buses.
Of the City’s 52 buses twenty (38%) are between 22 – 25 years old. Some Councillors seemed surprised at this revelation - surprising in itself as they approve the purchases and there are always lengthy discussions around the council table before purchases are made.
Be Ye Thankful
One Councillor noted that I should be "thankful” to be riding the 23 year old bus. He thought, I guess, that buses were better made then.
Yes, I am thankful because my health allows me to ride these old non-accessible buses. Many in our community can’t.
So here is the issue.
More people will use the system if it is accessible and provides quality service.
Does Council mow the parks with lawnmowers that are twenty three years old? Can you imagine how exercised our hockey players would get if 23 year old zambonis broke down and the ice couldn’t be cleared?.
We’ll have more on this meeting tomorrow.
The City of Burlington has initiated a cost containment exercise. And while, like motherhood and apple pie, we all want costs contained, we also want to maintain a decent transit system.
Some would argue we don’t have a decent system in this community now. Some transit users get frustrated, give up on the buses and buy cars. I heard of four who had just this week.
Sadly, many in the community don’t support public transit. Sometimes these people get elected. But I digress.
The presentation Doug Brown and I prepared is available should you be interested. (e-mail me at timberline24@hotmail.com)
The essence of the presentation was that it is important for our environment and important to the quality of life in our town that we have good transit.
We’d like the cost containment exercise to keep that in mind.
New Street # 10 Bus
A surprising amount of the discussion at Committee focused on the 23 year old bus I rode to City Hall.
Does this seem old to you? Twenty years ago all municipal buses were pulled from service after 18 years. That has changed ("financial constraints") - and Burlington has been buying and repairing old buses.
Of the City’s 52 buses twenty (38%) are between 22 – 25 years old. Some Councillors seemed surprised at this revelation - surprising in itself as they approve the purchases and there are always lengthy discussions around the council table before purchases are made.
Be Ye Thankful
One Councillor noted that I should be "thankful” to be riding the 23 year old bus. He thought, I guess, that buses were better made then.
Yes, I am thankful because my health allows me to ride these old non-accessible buses. Many in our community can’t.
So here is the issue.
More people will use the system if it is accessible and provides quality service.
Does Council mow the parks with lawnmowers that are twenty three years old? Can you imagine how exercised our hockey players would get if 23 year old zambonis broke down and the ice couldn’t be cleared?.
We’ll have more on this meeting tomorrow.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Trust the Process
“Trust the process.” Former Burlington mayor Walter Mulkewich brought this bit of advice to city Council last night.
This was in the context of trying to decide on a design option for the proposed Burlington Performing Arts Centre.
Good advice. But when is process finished, or started for that matter?
That was at the crux of the debate and, in fact, is at the centre of many city hall debates.
It is clear that there has been lots of process on this file. Meetings, reports, polling and public consultation go back at least six – some might even say nine - years.
Today’s politicians largely support “process.” But they are elected to make decisions. At the end of the day they have to raise their hands and vote yes or no. Opportunities can be missed and costs will escalate if decisions continually get put back.
A big part of yesterday’s debate was whether the proposed location of a studio theatre (front or back) best met the needs of potential user groups and the community.
It seemed early in the evening that most of those who supported and will use the Centre were satisfied with the “front” location.
Mayor Jackson didn’t see it that way. His reasonable view was that more process was needed, specifically around the studio theatre location. Toward the end of a sometimes acrimonious debate he moved an amendment:
“That the Project Management Team and the Performing Arts Advisory Committee must agree on the location of the studio theatre location before the design phase can commence.”
The motion was defeated four votes to three.
So, Councillors did indeed get to raise their hands and made a decision (on a 5 – 2 vote) to move a preferred option to the design development phase.
More To Come
There will still be lots of process. Concerns about escalating costs were mitigated only slightly by MP Mike Wallace’s commitment of $1.5 million additional federal support.
Those who see no value in such an important community project will be back. Neigbours will eventually have lots to say.
Parking as always is an issue on municipal projects – cost, accessibility and impacts on community.
Typically, those councillors who spoke about access to the facility talked of convenient car drop opportunities. Nary a thought that many users of the Centre would/could use public transit.
This was in the context of trying to decide on a design option for the proposed Burlington Performing Arts Centre.
Good advice. But when is process finished, or started for that matter?
That was at the crux of the debate and, in fact, is at the centre of many city hall debates.
It is clear that there has been lots of process on this file. Meetings, reports, polling and public consultation go back at least six – some might even say nine - years.
Today’s politicians largely support “process.” But they are elected to make decisions. At the end of the day they have to raise their hands and vote yes or no. Opportunities can be missed and costs will escalate if decisions continually get put back.
A big part of yesterday’s debate was whether the proposed location of a studio theatre (front or back) best met the needs of potential user groups and the community.
It seemed early in the evening that most of those who supported and will use the Centre were satisfied with the “front” location.
Mayor Jackson didn’t see it that way. His reasonable view was that more process was needed, specifically around the studio theatre location. Toward the end of a sometimes acrimonious debate he moved an amendment:
“That the Project Management Team and the Performing Arts Advisory Committee must agree on the location of the studio theatre location before the design phase can commence.”
The motion was defeated four votes to three.
So, Councillors did indeed get to raise their hands and made a decision (on a 5 – 2 vote) to move a preferred option to the design development phase.
More To Come
There will still be lots of process. Concerns about escalating costs were mitigated only slightly by MP Mike Wallace’s commitment of $1.5 million additional federal support.
Those who see no value in such an important community project will be back. Neigbours will eventually have lots to say.
Parking as always is an issue on municipal projects – cost, accessibility and impacts on community.
Typically, those councillors who spoke about access to the facility talked of convenient car drop opportunities. Nary a thought that many users of the Centre would/could use public transit.
Monday, March 17, 2008
“WHAT YOU ARE TELLING ME IS A MATTER OF MAJOR INSIGNFICANCE”
To paraphrase Art Linkletter; politicians say the darndest things. Case in point the pearl above from former Toronto Mayor Alan Lamport.
Although Lamport was good, or is it bad, Mel Lastman,Mayor of Toronto, (1997 – 2003) and North York (1972 -1997) would run a close second. Looking back at some of his best known lines oddly provides a bit of commentary on some of the municipal issues we have faced over the last twenty five years.
Mel was way ahead of his time.
“It would save energy. There are more car accidents at night. Everybody else is out of their heads if they don’t go along with this.”
Explaining why North York would introduce Daylight Saving time in March 1984, instead of in April. - 1984
Now that you he has some time on his hands Mel might be interested in season’s tickets for the new Burlington Performing Arts Centre?
“I can’t sit and listen to music. Opera would drive me out of my mind. Musicals I don’t enjoy. Or ballet. I’d go crazy. My nerves wouldn’t permit it.” - February 1986
Remember when the stores were closed on Sunday?
“It doesn’t make any sense that a consumer can drink or go the racetrack on Sunday but cannot buy a Bible or clothes. The law is discriminatory. There’s no two ways about it.”
In support of Sunday shopping - May 1995
Does the Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty understand this tugboat thing?
“Local governments are like tugboats – they’re manoeuvrable and get things done.”- August 1997
How does garbage pick up every two weeks grab you, Mel?
“I know if I walked out at night and saw a raccoon with those big eyes staring at me, I’d run… people are petrified to put the garbage out now.”
On his belief that raccoons, skunks and rats are drawn by garbage in once-a-week-pickup in Toronto. November 97
A lot of people are just figuring out what Mel knew all along.
“Everything (premier) Mike Harris touches turns to crap.”
During an attack on the premier over downloading costs dumped on the city - June 8, 2001
And speaking of crap
“Sometimes too much knowledge is a dangerous thing, almost, in some areas, in my view.
Words of wisdom from Mel’s friend Mike Harris.
As Alan Lamport once said: All this progress is marvelous… now if only it would stop.”
“I have decided that this will be may last year in office because, ladies and gentlemen, Toronto’s future is secure.” - April 2003
Although Lamport was good, or is it bad, Mel Lastman,Mayor of Toronto, (1997 – 2003) and North York (1972 -1997) would run a close second. Looking back at some of his best known lines oddly provides a bit of commentary on some of the municipal issues we have faced over the last twenty five years.
Mel was way ahead of his time.
“It would save energy. There are more car accidents at night. Everybody else is out of their heads if they don’t go along with this.”
Explaining why North York would introduce Daylight Saving time in March 1984, instead of in April. - 1984
Now that you he has some time on his hands Mel might be interested in season’s tickets for the new Burlington Performing Arts Centre?
“I can’t sit and listen to music. Opera would drive me out of my mind. Musicals I don’t enjoy. Or ballet. I’d go crazy. My nerves wouldn’t permit it.” - February 1986
Remember when the stores were closed on Sunday?
“It doesn’t make any sense that a consumer can drink or go the racetrack on Sunday but cannot buy a Bible or clothes. The law is discriminatory. There’s no two ways about it.”
In support of Sunday shopping - May 1995
Does the Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty understand this tugboat thing?
“Local governments are like tugboats – they’re manoeuvrable and get things done.”- August 1997
How does garbage pick up every two weeks grab you, Mel?
“I know if I walked out at night and saw a raccoon with those big eyes staring at me, I’d run… people are petrified to put the garbage out now.”
On his belief that raccoons, skunks and rats are drawn by garbage in once-a-week-pickup in Toronto. November 97
A lot of people are just figuring out what Mel knew all along.
“Everything (premier) Mike Harris touches turns to crap.”
During an attack on the premier over downloading costs dumped on the city - June 8, 2001
And speaking of crap
“Sometimes too much knowledge is a dangerous thing, almost, in some areas, in my view.
Words of wisdom from Mel’s friend Mike Harris.
As Alan Lamport once said: All this progress is marvelous… now if only it would stop.”
“I have decided that this will be may last year in office because, ladies and gentlemen, Toronto’s future is secure.” - April 2003
Friday, February 29, 2008
Sudbury Sunday Night
The Mayor is missing Bingo to hear Sir Elton singo
Don’t let the sun go down on Sudbury Sunday night?
Councillors paid their due, so what’s the hullabaloo.
But will they feel the love next Sudbury election night?
(With apologies to Stompin Tom)
Today’s question:
If Elton John came to Burlington would it create a political controversy?
In Sudbury – yes, Sudbury - it’s the new Watergate.
Just last month Sir Elton’s upcoming appearance at the Sudbury Arena was trumpeted as “the biggest concert in the city’s history." No arguments here.
“(M)onumental and will generate tremendous excitement for everyone in our city," noted the Sudbury Arena manager, who next week returns to more mundane matters such as keeping the Zamboni running.
Not the kind of Excitement that was Expected
The "excitement" has to do with the fact that city councillors got first dibs on tickets for the March 2nd concert. Local leaders snared 120 ducats ($87.50 to $129.50) before the box office opened. When the tickets went on sale to the masses, they were gone in minutes. No surprise.
According to the CBC, “outrage among fans who saw no reason why (the Councillors) should be able to jump the line” ensued.
At first Councillors dug in. After all they had paid for the tickets.
Rumours followed - the man who gave us Don’t Shoot Me - I’m Only the Piano Player - would skip the Big Nickel due to the bad vibes.
Municipal officials pressured the Sudbury Star: (C)ontinue “to report on the ticket controversy, the Elton John concert conceivably could be cancelled.”
Now, at Mayor John Rodriguez’s request, seventy-one tickets have been returned to the promoter. Forty-nine tickets are still out there - sold to family or friends or given to charity.
Today, the local paper reported the City has spent $12,000 during the last few days to hire a private law firm, as well as a public relations company to help it “deal with the ticket fiasco.”
Live/Learn and Rest
Sudbury has come clean (more or less) and grudgingly provided information to the public on the ticket buying.
"While this matter has been a significant learning process for the city, we sincerely hope that the disclosure of this information will put this matter to rest," Mark Mieto, the city's chief administrative officer, told the Sudbury Star.
Could this happen in the City of Burlington?
Not likely.
First - ask yourself why would Elton John come here? Sure, we’d like him to sing Candle in the Wind at the grand opening of the new pier. But it ain’t going to happen.
Old timers will remember Guy Lombardo, Jayne Mansfield and other greats at the old Brant Inn. I myself heard Lawrence Gowan at Sound of Music a few years ago and saw - have I mentioned this before - PET in Central Park during the Trudeaumania days of 1968.
But Elton John is big. He is, to these aforementioned entertainers, as George Orwell is to this blogger.
Besides, I’m sure we have policies in our town guarding against the kind of abuse of power we’ve seen this month at Sudbury’s Silly Hall.
Actually, I should know this having been there. But, of such policies, I have no recollection, as they say.
I remain confident, nevertheless, that, if policies are needed Mayor Cam and the Gang of Six will, in their wisdom, attend to it.
Don’t let the sun go down on Sudbury Sunday night?
Councillors paid their due, so what’s the hullabaloo.
But will they feel the love next Sudbury election night?
(With apologies to Stompin Tom)
Today’s question:
If Elton John came to Burlington would it create a political controversy?
In Sudbury – yes, Sudbury - it’s the new Watergate.
Just last month Sir Elton’s upcoming appearance at the Sudbury Arena was trumpeted as “the biggest concert in the city’s history." No arguments here.
“(M)onumental and will generate tremendous excitement for everyone in our city," noted the Sudbury Arena manager, who next week returns to more mundane matters such as keeping the Zamboni running.
Not the kind of Excitement that was Expected
The "excitement" has to do with the fact that city councillors got first dibs on tickets for the March 2nd concert. Local leaders snared 120 ducats ($87.50 to $129.50) before the box office opened. When the tickets went on sale to the masses, they were gone in minutes. No surprise.
According to the CBC, “outrage among fans who saw no reason why (the Councillors) should be able to jump the line” ensued.
At first Councillors dug in. After all they had paid for the tickets.
Rumours followed - the man who gave us Don’t Shoot Me - I’m Only the Piano Player - would skip the Big Nickel due to the bad vibes.
Municipal officials pressured the Sudbury Star: (C)ontinue “to report on the ticket controversy, the Elton John concert conceivably could be cancelled.”
Now, at Mayor John Rodriguez’s request, seventy-one tickets have been returned to the promoter. Forty-nine tickets are still out there - sold to family or friends or given to charity.
Today, the local paper reported the City has spent $12,000 during the last few days to hire a private law firm, as well as a public relations company to help it “deal with the ticket fiasco.”
Live/Learn and Rest
Sudbury has come clean (more or less) and grudgingly provided information to the public on the ticket buying.
"While this matter has been a significant learning process for the city, we sincerely hope that the disclosure of this information will put this matter to rest," Mark Mieto, the city's chief administrative officer, told the Sudbury Star.
Could this happen in the City of Burlington?
Not likely.
First - ask yourself why would Elton John come here? Sure, we’d like him to sing Candle in the Wind at the grand opening of the new pier. But it ain’t going to happen.
Old timers will remember Guy Lombardo, Jayne Mansfield and other greats at the old Brant Inn. I myself heard Lawrence Gowan at Sound of Music a few years ago and saw - have I mentioned this before - PET in Central Park during the Trudeaumania days of 1968.
But Elton John is big. He is, to these aforementioned entertainers, as George Orwell is to this blogger.
Besides, I’m sure we have policies in our town guarding against the kind of abuse of power we’ve seen this month at Sudbury’s Silly Hall.
Actually, I should know this having been there. But, of such policies, I have no recollection, as they say.
I remain confident, nevertheless, that, if policies are needed Mayor Cam and the Gang of Six will, in their wisdom, attend to it.
Monday, February 18, 2008
Greetings on Family Day
For a time I was a municipal councillor.
One of the really difficult things - and I took this seriously – was bringing greetings from the City. This was a frequent assignment for a Councillor acting as deputy when the mayor wasn’t available.
The required off the cuff comments were tough for me.
As today is Family Day I worry what I would have said if I were assigned “greetings” on this date.
So here it is.
On behalf of the City of Burlington I’d like to welcome you here on the first Family Day and tell you to “Take a Hike.”
I say “Take a Hike” not just because the exercise will do you good but also because if you don’t have a car (and many of you don’t) or you choose not to drive for environmental reasons you’ll have no choice as there is no Public Transit in Burlington today.
Take a Hike to our eastern and western borders and ride Oakville Transit or Hamilton Street Railway as they are running today.
Or take a longer hike to just about any other municipality in the area (e.g. Brampton, St. Catharines, Guelph, Mississauga, Niagara Falls, Oshawa etc.) and you can ride a bus today.
But Seriously
Perhaps I’m missing something but isn’t something terribly wrong here? Shouldn’t Burlington residents have the opportunity to visit family members at Joseph Brant or get to work (40% of us are working today) or recreational opportunities by public transit?
A 2006 consultant’s report, accepted by Council, recommended provision of holiday service. Why are we so different than other communities? (I’ve found two where transit isn't running today – Milton and Port Perry.)
Any ideas what can be done?
One of the really difficult things - and I took this seriously – was bringing greetings from the City. This was a frequent assignment for a Councillor acting as deputy when the mayor wasn’t available.
The required off the cuff comments were tough for me.
As today is Family Day I worry what I would have said if I were assigned “greetings” on this date.
So here it is.
On behalf of the City of Burlington I’d like to welcome you here on the first Family Day and tell you to “Take a Hike.”
I say “Take a Hike” not just because the exercise will do you good but also because if you don’t have a car (and many of you don’t) or you choose not to drive for environmental reasons you’ll have no choice as there is no Public Transit in Burlington today.
Take a Hike to our eastern and western borders and ride Oakville Transit or Hamilton Street Railway as they are running today.
Or take a longer hike to just about any other municipality in the area (e.g. Brampton, St. Catharines, Guelph, Mississauga, Niagara Falls, Oshawa etc.) and you can ride a bus today.
But Seriously
Perhaps I’m missing something but isn’t something terribly wrong here? Shouldn’t Burlington residents have the opportunity to visit family members at Joseph Brant or get to work (40% of us are working today) or recreational opportunities by public transit?
A 2006 consultant’s report, accepted by Council, recommended provision of holiday service. Why are we so different than other communities? (I’ve found two where transit isn't running today – Milton and Port Perry.)
Any ideas what can be done?
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Something Positive for a Winter Day
I was going to write something on Environmental Commissioner Gord Miller’s annual environmental report - Reconciling Our Priorities – but it is so depressing.
Basically, he says that our planning processes and mechanisms are outdated and loaded with conflicting priorities. We have no effective mechanisms in place to reconcile conflicting priorities.
Who needs such excessive negativity in the middle of February? We’ll come back to Gord’s report at a later day.
Happy Days
How about some good news?
I just read that RWDI Consultants in Guelph have proven that restaurants with a drive-through window are more environmentally friendly than those without.
This is indeed good news particularly as there seems to be one of these things at every corner.
Apparently RWDI found that a drive-through serving 150 vehicles in an hour is roughly equivalent to the emissions from one motorcycle operating at 50 km/h for an hour, or two home woodstoves operating for an hour, or about three six-horsepower lawnmowers operating for an hour.
Last March your blogger sent crack gonzo journalist Hunter R. Wilson to a New Street phone booth to research drive through activity (see Drive Throughs Need Restrictions(03/12/07). How could we have been so wrong as to not take into account all the pollution being caused by non drive through patrons driving their cars around parking lots looking for empty spaces like RWDI did?
Well, I wasn’t very good in science and these consultants are. Four hundred employees with doctorates and engineering and science degrees can't be wrong.
And they get paid for this stuff. Whereas, I with my an undergraduate arts degree, am just blowing smoke.
Proposed Change
So based on this research here is an idea.
Let’s close down these places that sell food but have been unable to adapt to our car culture. Every restaurant without a drive through should be illegal. That will just be a start.
Next step will be a requirement that all retail operations will be required to have a drive through.
It will be good for the environment. And it cheers me up just thinking about it. How about you?
Basically, he says that our planning processes and mechanisms are outdated and loaded with conflicting priorities. We have no effective mechanisms in place to reconcile conflicting priorities.
Who needs such excessive negativity in the middle of February? We’ll come back to Gord’s report at a later day.
Happy Days
How about some good news?
I just read that RWDI Consultants in Guelph have proven that restaurants with a drive-through window are more environmentally friendly than those without.
This is indeed good news particularly as there seems to be one of these things at every corner.
Apparently RWDI found that a drive-through serving 150 vehicles in an hour is roughly equivalent to the emissions from one motorcycle operating at 50 km/h for an hour, or two home woodstoves operating for an hour, or about three six-horsepower lawnmowers operating for an hour.
Last March your blogger sent crack gonzo journalist Hunter R. Wilson to a New Street phone booth to research drive through activity (see Drive Throughs Need Restrictions(03/12/07). How could we have been so wrong as to not take into account all the pollution being caused by non drive through patrons driving their cars around parking lots looking for empty spaces like RWDI did?
Well, I wasn’t very good in science and these consultants are. Four hundred employees with doctorates and engineering and science degrees can't be wrong.
And they get paid for this stuff. Whereas, I with my an undergraduate arts degree, am just blowing smoke.
Proposed Change
So based on this research here is an idea.
Let’s close down these places that sell food but have been unable to adapt to our car culture. Every restaurant without a drive through should be illegal. That will just be a start.
Next step will be a requirement that all retail operations will be required to have a drive through.
It will be good for the environment. And it cheers me up just thinking about it. How about you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)