Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Police Budgets

Here is a timely opinion piece by Mohamad Bsat.  It is called Why is Hamilton's Police Budget so taboo? and can be found ahttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/election-column-police-budget-1.6587782?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar  

The piece brought back memories from many years ago when I tried to reduce the police budget.I recollected that event in the poem that follows.

                                    ---------------------------------

                The Budget*

On a long ago budget day, a procedural quirk
put a simple regional ward councillor
in a position to freeze the police budget.
Ward councillors don’t obstruct police budgets
because, as we all learned as kids,
the police(man) is our friend
does important and dangerous work
protects and keep us safe and
for all of this deserves to be well paid.


These are things that ward councillors,
even simple ones, should understand.
But since the common sense drumbeat
set the revolution in motion
we have come to know that the best government is
to have practically no government at all
and respect for hard-earned taxpayer’s dollars
is the order of the day.

Others are compelled to run their ship tightly
while the law and order liner sails unimpeded
through the calm waters of political indifference.
On that budget day, the simple ward councillor
Having, for a time, ascended
to the lofty heights of budget committee member
advanced what was (by his own humble admission)
a particularly persuasive presentation
convincing the one colleague who needed convincing
that police spending should be apprehended and
it was a great day for local democracy
or at least it seemed that way.
But the votes aren’t counted
until the politicians raise their hands
and when they did
the police got their money, as they always do.

No media or public witnessed the sad event though
police brass made time in otherwise busy days
to behold the councillor’s misbegotten manoeuvre.
Following his 15 minutes of small town fame
our councillor drove his car like an undertaker.
Even now, my lane changes are by-the-book perfect
and inviolable police budgets escalate still.
                                       ---------------------------------

*Originally published in The Dream The Glory and The StrifeRaymond Fenech (Editor), Barnes and Noble 2016


Sunday, September 04, 2022

Looking for Respect


After the recent disturbing verbal assault on Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, I flashed back to 1965.  Remember that hit song Eve of Destruction song by Barry McGuire?  

Songwriter P.F. Sloan bemoaned the disintegration of human respect; found “the whole crazy world  ...just too frustratin'” Grim as it was in 1965, I doubt Sloan or McGuire could have imagined the extent of disintegration we are facing in 2022. 

Based on what I and others observe that is offered up on social media these days this attack on Freeland is not unique. Women. racialized individuals and groups, LGBQT people, non- Christians are all targets.  The list could go on.  
Deputy PM Freeland


In fact, it is pretty much open season for attacks against anyone whose opinion differs from that often anonymous person tethered to the keyboard whose only qualification to shout and fume is their ability to remember a password  

Politicians at all levels are under siege and things are heading downhill fast.

In my time as a municipal councillor (1991-97) it wasn’t like this.  In 1998, after serving for six years I presented a paper at a health promotion conference on local government and how it could work most effectively with community. 

The mainly European audience at a Scottish university challenged my thesis that local government was up to the task.

My theme was based on a fairly positive perception of local government and my optimistic, clearly biased view of elected officials

I put it all down to the fact that we just did a better job of local governance in North America.  The old world didn’t get it.

Then I moved on to other things.

After a nine year break I was back in local politics when my former wardmate moved on down the road to the House of Commons. Nine years away and boy how things had changed.

That change was brought about as people gained access to electronic mail, the internet and social media.

Back in the old days if a constituent had an issue to discuss it could often get resolved through something called dialogue. You remember that concept perhaps.

The councillor would make a phone call or meet in person with the constituent.  There were often nuances or complexities that one or the other had failed to take into account   Issues got resolved.  There was no shouting.

By the 21st century constituents simply had to go to their computer and punch in the requisite putdown, question your integrity and/or intelligence and copy the whole diatribe to everyone on their contact list. 

I should have seen this coming.  Back around 1998 I met futurist Robert Theobald.  Theobald argued that a “failure to listen” by decision makers had meant “that groups with certain attitudes and beliefs may come to feel they have been left out of the democratic process.”  In Reworking Success (1997) Theobald proposed that we move beyond “polar positions” and learn to define problems in wholly different terms.

Something to think about.

In the meantime let’s: 

**Stop the name calling in our public spheres. 

**Teach civics in our schools.  (Ontario is introducing a compulsory half credit program in September 2022 – a positive development)

**Find ways to ensure that news coverage focusses on facts.  I’m pretty sure the earth is round although I haven’t actually seen it in its roundness. We don’t give equal time to the flat earth society.  Why do we give it to crazy conspiracy theorists?

**Establish new rules for social media.  It won’t be simple but a balance needs to be found between the right for us to speak our minds and what is appropriate,  constructive and healthy.   



Monday, June 06, 2022

D-Day


*Nearly 150,000 Allied troops landed or parachuted into the invasion area on D-Day, including 14,000 Canadians at Juno Beach. My father was one of the men who landed that day.

(This piece adapted from the Sherbrooke Fusilier War Diaries originally appeared in The Dream The Glory and the Strife edited by Raymond Fenech - 2018 Hidden Brook Press.) 


Found in the Sherbrooke Fusilier War Diaries 
                
June 4-6 1944                                              
                                                                                     
High winds and low clouds stall D-Day 24 hours.          
In spite of the wind the flotilla sails southward                        
all night via charted channel waters. Men ruminate     
over what awaits on shore then land is sighted             
at 1000 hrs off Berniere-Sur-Mere. Craft start                        
the run in to the beach, men quite calm                        
sitting on top of their vehicles watch the shore.   
The Regiment lands, moves forward, no casualties                  
but next day German tanks make a first appearance,  
force the CDN infantry to retire with 63 killed,              
wounded or missing. Later, ready to move on                
a half hour notice, the sun sets amidst black                          
banks of clouds leaving a dirty red smudgy sky             
with the boom of distant gunfire broken                        
by the sharper rattle of nearby machine guns.
Everything seems ominous. Everyone is on alert.          
                                                                                   
July 18, 1944                                         

The shadow of death passes over Headquarters. 
In minutes, 21 cm mortars take thirty-one lives. 
Heavier casualties than a normal day’s fighting.            
                                                                                                              
August 25, 1944                                           
                                                                                     
An extensive map issue arrives showing vast
distances and fabulous advances imagined by HQ.
Startling indeed, as those left from D-Day recall
the slow, difficult struggle for CAEN and the
devastating exploitation and FALAISE assault.
Two days later considerable friction develops                 
among all command levels. Little is accomplished         
due to the lack of appreciation by the Infantry              
of issues arising using armour in country where
dense woods greatly limit the traversing of guns.
                                                                                     
September 1944 – May 1945                                                                                                                                                                     
A few men who were through the thickest fighting                  
are a little jittery yet but doing well and should            
soon be over it as the Regiment fights on in NWE. 


The Royal Canadian Navy contributed 110 ships and 10,000 sailors and the RCAF contributed 15 fighter and fighter-bomber squadrons to the assault. Total Allied casualties on D-Day reached more than 10,000, including 1,074 Canadians, of whom 359 were killed. By the end of the Battle of Normandy, the Allies had suffered 209,000 casualties, including more than 18,700 Canadians. Over 5,000 Canadian soldiers died. (From the Canadian Encyclopedia.)

Monday, May 30, 2022

We Must Act Without Delay


I am a senior concerned about future generations; i.e., I want them to have a future on a livable planet.

A UN climate report predicts quicker global warming than anticipated.  It is a “code red” for humanity, according to the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

The Intergovernmental panel on climate change conclusions were clear. We must stop fossil fuel expansion, rapidly phase out the production and burning of fossil fuels, and invest heavily in renewable energy.

Meanwhile in Ontario Doug Ford has:
  • Spent over $230 million to tear up green energy contracts.
  • Ripped out Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations that had been installed at GO Stations.
  • Cut the big energy users electricity bills while shifting those costs to citizens.
  • Cancelled rebates on EVs.
  • Gutted conservation authorities’ ability to protect communities against flooding and erosion.

  • Weakened the Endangered Species Act to promote development.
  • Escalated the use of Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZO’s) to push through development on sensitive ecological lands and 
  • Scrapped the provincial tree-planting program.
 
These are but a few examples of Ford’s lack of understanding of the climate emergency we are facing.  Incredibly, this week he claimed that building more highways was a solution to the crisis.
 
We need to protect wetlands, waterways, forests and other natural ecosystems. We must create adaptation plans that range from climate risk reduction to strengthened income and food security provisions.
 
We must act without delay.

 


Wednesday, May 04, 2022

Deserving

(I'm hoping that the 2022 Ontario election campaign looks at the issue of poverty.  Here is a story I wrote on poverty in Ontario.  I made it up but it could be true. This story won the 2021 Norfolk County’s Laureate award for fiction.  It will take you about 18 minutes to read.  

-----------

“You need to tell them where the bodies are buried.”

Councillor Ken Williams could not get that strange phone message out of his head.

There had been that anonymous call left on his voice mail this morning – the fourth consecutive day this had occurred.  Of course, it wasn’t that unusual to get odd calls. 

Somehow, though, this one was different.

What bodies?  Buried where, he wondered.

Williams, Ward 2 Councillor for the City of Clarovista, was headed into a municipal council meeting on this gloomy Tuesday.  It promised to be a long day.  

As he made his way to his seat, Williams was approached by Sharon Smith, the diligent city reporter for the Clarovista Clarion.

“Councillor Williams, could I speak with you about some strange calls we have been getting at the Clarion?”

“I’m not sure I could help you about calls you are receiving Sharon,” Williams answered warily.  

“They have been mentioning your name,” she continued.

“My name? Umm, sure.  Perhaps we could talk after the meeting.”

“Alright then, I’ll catch you after. Doesn’t look like there will be much exciting news to write about from this meeting.”

Just then Mayor Ted Martin, decked out in a designer Grey Notch Lapel Suit complete with chain of office trailed by his executive assistant, glided past Smith and Williams. Late by about ten minutes as is/was his custom.  Now the meeting could commence.

This was Williams’ sixth year on Council.  He’d long ago figured out the routine.  As sure as the rainbow smelt will run into Lake Vista in the spring, staff bring this particular report every April.  It is called The Annual Review of Grants for Agencies and Organizations that Operate Health and/or Social Services Programs. 

The verbose report title mirrored an awkward process that compelled organizations to jump through a nonsensical number of unnecessary hoops. That review would likely take up the bulk of today’s meeting.

The regular April crowd was all there; agency people, community activists, those with lived experience.  Some of Williams’ colleagues referred to these people as members of “special interest groups.” But Williams had learned long ago from his trade unionist grandfather who the real special interest groups were.  

“Kenny,” he’d say, “never underestimate the power of the banks and their shady sidekicks – the developers.”  

This year Council had an additional delegation, an expert on social policy from the university.  Williams knew Dr. Patricia Fleming slightly and had gone to a couple of seminars in which she had participated.

Fleming was called to the lectern by the Mayor and began her presentation with the usual salutary remarks. Then she moved on to territory that was familiar to Williams.
“Ontario’s treatment of the poor goes back to the 18th century and is built on the whole idea that there are two types of poor people - deserving poor and the non-deserving poor,” she lectured. 

Williams knew this; had made the point himself as it related to the current situation in the 
province.
“The first piece of legislation important for you to understand,” Fleming continued, “is the Constitution Act of 1791.”

Oh dear, thought Williams, she will never get through 204 years of Ontario social policy history within her ten-minute time allocation.

“In setting up the governance structure for Upper Canada, or Ontario as we now know it, Lieutenant Governor Simcoe took most elements from Great Britain’s legislation except, and this is paramount, not the poor law.  Other jurisdictions, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, to name two, adopted the Poor Laws.  You must appreciate that this effort to ban a poor law in Ontario promoted the growth of private charities.  All these charities held their own distinct beliefs and this resulted in weakening of public support for those in need.”

Mayor Martin cleared his throat.  

“Mrs. Fleming I’m concerned that you are veering off topic.  I’m having trouble seeing 
what any of what you are saying has to do with what is on the agenda today.”

“It’s Doctor Fleming, sir.  On the contrary Mr. Mayor this history has everything to do with today’s agenda.  May I continue without interruption, please?”

“Before you do, could you tell us a little more about Poor Laws, Dr. Fleming,” piped up Councillor Jim Bristow.

“No, No, Councillor there will be time for questions later. I need to keep Mrs. Fleming, Dr Fleming, on track.” The Mayor liked to be in control.   

Dr. Fleming carried on.

“As I was saying in Ontario, specific forms of outdoor relief (coal, bread, milk) and institutional relief were offered to those who were considered deserving. We are talking here about the aged and infirm, widows, “deserted” mothers, apprenticed children.  In addition, sometimes public work jobs were provided to new arrivals and those considered able-bodied."  

Just as the Mayor was about to interrupt again there was grumbling and shuffling in the public seats.  As Martin reached for his gavel, two determined women rushed the dais.  One grabbed the chief magistrate by his shoulders while the other attempted to yank the chain of office from his neck.  This removal was not without difficulty especially as the mayor’s dutiful assistant had leapt into the fray to save the Mayor from harm.  

Harming the Mayor was not part of the plan though; it was the chain of office the women were after. After a short tussle, the assailants had the chain in hand and were dashing out of the committee room shouting something about justice, a cover up and buried bodies.  Williams recognized these women from earlier protest actions around town.  They were part of a group called Clarovista Coalition for Fairness and Justice (CCFJ).
.
Meanwhile the Mayor lay sprawled inelegantly on the floor.

“We will have a fifteen-minute adjournment,” mewled his worship as he struggled to regain his feet - unhurt but dispossessed of the 130-year-old symbol of mayoral primacy.
Members of the public and those Clarovista bureaucrats assembled for the meeting sat in stunned silence.

“Wow. Now I’ve got a story idea,” Sharon Smith declared. 

As what had happened was unprecedented no one really knew what to do.  The exhaustive Clarovista emergency preparedness booklet that detailed procedures did not cover theft of the chain of office. Consequently no one thought to pursue the thieves.

The Mayor staggered from the room as his executive assistant announced that it had now been decided that the meeting was adjourned at the call of the Chair.  

Dr. Fleming had returned to the dais and was trying to be heard while waving a book over her head.  Her efforts were pointless as no one could hear above the commotion.  

Sharon Smith, the reporter, had found a quiet place to send in her story. 

For his part, Williams meandered to the front of the room to persuade Dr. Fleming that it might be best to send in the remainder of her presentation to the clerk’s department.  They would distribute it to Council members.  She seemed deflated but handed Williams a book entitled Poverty in Ontario 1791-2000.

“I’d like you to have this book Councillor Williams.  I think you will find the chapter that covers the history of the Clarovista Poorhouse of particular interest."

Days went by and yet there was no news of the missing chain of office.

After all that had occurred at the Tuesday Council the meeting that reconvened the following Monday was somewhat of an anti-climax.  

Not to the various agencies who had appealed their grants, of course.  Some of their appeals were successful, others not.  Councillors seized the opportunity to interject their presumed sage advice to the various agencies - Do more with less, build partnerships, consider more fundraising projects.  Always at play was the whole matter of who ought to get service and who was not really entitled to it.  After all the hard-working families of Clarovista could not be expected to dig into their pocketbooks to support every nutty idea the kumbaya crowd chose to advance.

Those same issues were dealt with at length in Poverty in Ontario 1791-1995. Dr. Fleming had written a surprisingly interesting book.  Chapter Sixteen, which dealt with the history of the Clarovista poorhouse, filled in some blanks for Williams who had put aside other reading on the weekend to go through Fleming’s book.

Of course, Williams knew that poorhouses were established in the mid 19th century
to house people who required food, shelter, or care in order to survive.

The poorhouse was a response to the number of people begging on the streets, wandering the countryside, or languishing in jails.

The Clarovista poorhouse existed from 1877 up until 1933 when the municipality decided to sell off assets to raise money during the depression.  The property had been in what is currently Williams’ ward somewhere up in the northeast corner near where Mayor Martin lives.  Williams studied the map that was included in Fleming’s book.  Hold on.

“This is the mayor’s property.  That’s odd,” Williams said aloud.    

Chapter 16 laid out a map of the Poorhouse and its 50-acre site complete with building sketches showing the large stone house built in the Italianate style, barn and various out buildings, the hospital wing and the pest house.  The living arrangements were dormitory style – one side of the house women and children; the other for men.    

There were also drawings of the confinement cells or idiot cells as they were called that were used for discipline purposes. Sadly, two brothers, Harold (Inmate #1238) and Joseph Cook Inmate #1239), incarcerated behind the iron cell doors of the confinement cells perished in a fire in 1933.   The brothers had been locked in the cells for repeatedly violating the curfew and for their inability and unwillingness to find work. 

It was said that they missed curfew as they were travelling to distant towns looking for work that was hard to come by during the depression.  But at the poorhouse rules were rules and the Cook brothers had run afoul of those rules.  
 
Some in the community had called for an inquest but the authorities decided against one as fire deaths were fairly common at the time and there were complications as there was some confusion as to the location of the remains of the deceased brothers. 

The main building had been destroyed contributing to the decision to sell the property. Inmates were relocated to nearby Carson Creek.  

The Keeper, Janek Marcin, left town but turned up several years later living on the same property.  
 
How did one become an inmate at the Clarovista Poorhouse, Williams wondered.

Dr. Fleming had provided her business card with her book.  Her home number was on the back of the card. Williams dialed the number.

“Dr. Fleming, Ken Williams here.  I’m enjoying your book.  Could I ask you a couple of questions?”

“Certainly Councillor, I have some time, go ahead.”

“Well, I’m not totally clear on how people became inmates – inmate that is a horrible word - of the poorhouse.”

“It was fairly simple. Your predecessors were quite involved.”

“The Council was involved?”

“Yes.  People who had been living in Clarovista for at least two years who needed help could apply to the mayor.  The mayor and council would determine whether the Poorhouse was the best fit for the individual or family.   Then they would have to approve a recommendation for the person or people to be sent to the Poorhouse.  It was a public process like authorizing spending for a bridge or approving monies to send a councillor to a conference.”

“This just seems wrong, Dr. Fleming.”

“Yes, of course it is wrong but is it really any different than what Council does these days?  

Last week’s meeting is a case in point.  Agencies having to grovel and answer ridiculous questions from uniformed members of council Not you Councillor, of course.) in order to maintain their organizations funding or get small incremental increases to continue important community work.” 

“The budget is really tight this year, Patricia.”

“But the budget isn’t the issue, Ken.  There is a bigger community picture at play.
They chatted some more. After Dr Fleming hung up Williams was left with an uneasy feeling as he returned to his reading.

In that year of the fire, 1933, thirty percent of the labour force was out of work, and one-fifth of the population was dependent on government assistance. Ironically, the Cook brothers’ grandfather, Jonah Cook, had donated part of his farm to the County as the site for the Poorhouse.

The phone rang interrupting Williams.  It was Sharon Smith from the Clarion.  Williams considered not picking up but did just before the call went to voice mail.

Ms. Smith, how are you today?”

“Fine, Councillor.  I’m looking for a comment.”

“On……?”

“The Chain of Office has been located on the Mayor’s property in a small wooded area.”

“Really!”

“Yes, what do you think of that, Councillor Williams?”

“Well, what I think is that you should ask the mayor about it.”

“I have.  He wasn’t helpful.”

“Wasn’t helpful?”

“He said it was none of my business what was on his property. Stay off his property. He was almost shouting. The Chain of Office has been recovered and that was that.”

“Well, there is some truth to what the mayor said, don’t you think?”

“Sure, some truth.  But the Chain was in a strange spot.”

“Well, of course, it was in the woods on the mayor’s rather nice property.  It is supposed to be at city hall.” 

“No.  That’s not what I mean.  It was around the neck of a scarecrow that was dressed in a grey suit, with a City of Clarovista lapel pin and an official tie.  The scarecrow was dressed to, you know, look like the mayor.  And it had a note pinned to it.”

“A scarecrow with a note pinned to it?”

“Yes.  Here is what it said.  

Knock, knock
Who’s over there?
Harold and Joseph
And no one cares.
  
And this mayor scarecrow thingy is pointing off further into the woods.  Do you understand any of it? What is the story here?”

Williams took a deep breath thinking of how to answer.

“Those calls we’ve been getting are beginning to make sense. Maybe history has something to tell us when we know where the bodies are buried.  That’s what you should write about.”


Friday, April 15, 2022

Ending Wetland Protection: Trashing Nature’s Clean Water Filter

Below is one of thirty three  crimes against the environment committed by Doug Ford’s government and documented by Seniors for Climate Action Now (SCAN!).  

----------   


The Ford government says it is delivering on a commitment to conserve and restore natural ecosystems, including wetlands. 

Its actions belie this claim. 

According to Ontario Nature, “wetlands are critical to water filtration, flood retention, erosion control, carbon storage, nutrient cycling and groundwater recharge.” 

Conservation Authorities are empowered to regulate development and activities in wetlands, watercourses, hazardous lands and other similar areas.

But in December 2020, the Ford government reduced the power of local conservation authorities. Bill 229 effectively took away the ability of authorities to deny development on wetlands by ensuring they can be overruled by non-appealable Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs). 

Then in March, the Ford government went further introducing legislation to rewrite provincial law retroactively. Its amendments to Ontario’s Planning Act nullify a key clause that limits the scope of MZOs. 

This retroactive change was in advance of the Ford government’s ongoing attempt to pave the way for a 4 million square foot warehouse on Duffin’s Creek, a provincially significant Pickering wetland. That warehouse would be the size of 45 Canadian football fields. 

The government previously issued a MZO to fast track the project, strip the site of its vegetation and fill it with soil. Fortunately, pressure from environmental and citizen groups and 

First Nations including the Williams Treaties First Nations stopped the project and forced Pickering Council to reverse its position and the province to back down. 

Now the Holland Marsh is under threat. The proposed Bradford Bypass would cross one of the most productive agricultural areas in Canada and impact 39 hectares of wildlife habitat and wetlands that species depend on. The Ford government believes no new environmental assessment is needed.

We are losing wetlands at an alarming rate, less than 30 per cent of southern Ontario’s original wetlands remain, and just 10 per cent survive in Niagara and the GTA. Ontario needs: To restore the oversight powers of conservation authorities’ To rescind recent amendments to the Planning Act so that Ministerial Zoning Orders must be consistent with the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statements. To plan with appropriate consultation as outlined in the Planning Act with municipalities and First Nations. To conduct a Federal Environmental Assessment for the Bradford Bypass project.

Ontario needs: 

  • To restore the oversight powers of conservation authorities’ 
  • To rescind recent amendments to the Planning Act so that Ministerial Zoning Orders must be consistent with the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statements. 
  • To plan with appropriate consultation as outlined in the Planning Act with municipalities and First Nations. 
  • To conduct a Federal Environmental Assessment for the Bradford Bypass project.

Sources: 

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2021/03/15/pickering-wetlands-fast-tracked-for-development-by-doug-fordsgovernment-gets-temporary-reprieve.html 

https://ecojustice.ca/conserving-ontarios-intact-wetlands-is-vital-to-protecting-biodiversity/ 

https://ontarionature.org/news-release/lower-duffins-finally-protected/ 

https://www.thelawyersdaily.ca/articles/26725 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-duffins-creek-wetland-pickering-ajax-warehouseamazon-1.5942938




Read ten climate reasons to defeat Ford at https://seniorsforclimateactionnow.org/ten-climate-reasons-to-defeat-ford/

Read about the other 32 crimes at https://seniorsforclimateactionnow.org/doug-fords-climate-crimes/



Friday, February 11, 2022

Laws

I’ve been thinking about breaking the law a fair bit lately.

No, I’m not planning a bank heist, I seldom drive over the speed limit and I’ve been wearing my mask at all the right times and places.

But watching recent events in Ottawa and other jurisdictions how can one not help but think about law breaking?

The gang in Ottawa mislabelled as the Trucker’s Convoy aren’t truckers. Based on their demands they are, at worst insurrectionists; at best, failed civic students.  And convoys move.  These guys are parked and in some cases have taken their wheels off.  They are honking their horns. And they are breaking the law.

Alan Borovoy thought seriously about law breaking.  For many years Borovoy was general counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.  Borovoy spent a lifetime fighting for justice. He passed away in 2015. In his book Uncivil Obedience – The Tactics and Tales of A Democratic Agitator he argues that there is no justification in a democratic society for breaking the law to get justice.   Borovoy’s strong belief was that there are enough legal tools at the disposal of activists to fight injustice without resorting to breaking the law. 

“We should obey the law but stick it to the government anyway,” he wrote.

Back in the day (before I read Borovoy’s book) I was involved in anti-junk mail advocacy.  Our main target was Canada Post.  And to us environmentalists, privacy advocates and curmudgeons the issue was a simple one.  Shouldn’t you have the right to stop unwanted materials from coming to your door?  One form of protest we undertook was stuffing a Canada Post mailbox with unwanted, unsolicited junk mail.  

That was against the law.  (See Sections 48 and 49 of the Canada Post Corporation Act.)  Not a hanging crime, pretty minor stuff really.  

But applying Borovoy’s reasoning one has to ask what gave us self-appointed anti-junk mail crusaders the right, no matter how good our cause, to break the law.   

Borovoy’s recommended uncivil but obedient tactics included:

• Exerting enough pressure to make authorities negotiate but not so much they will lose. Doing this will get the fence sitters on your side. 

• Speaking over the heads of those attending your events.  While only the converted may attend a rally or demonstration, the message must go over the heads of those present to be effective. 

• Using the strength of your opponent.  Borovoy recognizes that publicizing the extreme positions of opponents was often the key to success.  Pull your adversaries’ tails and they will squeal obligingly.

Contrast how the Ottawa insurrectionists are being treated by authorities to what has happened to others. 

Case in point is the treatment of supporters of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation in their opposition to the Coastal GasLink pipeline.  Protestors have been handled aggressively by the RCMP.  Journalists, merely doing their jobs, have been arrested.

Those supporters object to a pipeline that would transport liquefied natural gas from northeast British Columbia to a terminal on the coast near the town of Kitimat. It would cross 22,000 square kilometers of unceeded Wet’suwet’en land. The hereditary chiefs of the Wet’suwet’en Nation have come out against the project.

I’m trying to imagine what the indigenous perspective would be on Borovoy’s ideas.  What strikes me is that being uncivil but obedient doesn’t seem to be doing much good.

Perhaps Mahatma Gandhi’s challenges to authority can provide food for thought.  

Gandhi broke the law and was jailed many times.  At one trial he said, “In my humble opinion, non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good.” 

His Salt March is instructive. Salt was an important part of the Indian diet.  However Indians could only buy it from the British and there was a significant sales tax on top of it. 

On March 12, 1930 Gandhi began a march of 388 kilometres (241 miles) from Sabermanti to the ocean.  When he arrived at Dandi on the Arabian Sea he broke the law making salt from seawater. This act clearly violated Britain’s Salt Acts that prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt.  Sixty thousand people across India were arrested as a result of the civil disobedience that followed.   Gandhi himself was arrested about a month later.

Making salt, stuffing mailboxes, honking your horn all can be classified as law breaking activities.  

Calling for the unconstitutional overthrow of the government seems to me to be law breaking of a different order.